Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NOT LINDBERGH BABY

BASIS OF HAUPTMANN’S APPEAL. NEW LAWYERS NOW ENGAGED. By Telegraph—Press Assn.—Copyright. New York, Feb. 21. The new lawyers representing Bernard Richard Hauptmann, convicted of the murder of the Lindbergh child, are basing their appeal on the claim that the body found was not the Lindbergh in- : fant, the latter presumably being still alive, this in the face of the parents’ positive identification.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19350225.2.100.5

Bibliographic details

Taranaki Daily News, 25 February 1935, Page 8

Word Count
65

NOT LINDBERGH BABY Taranaki Daily News, 25 February 1935, Page 8

NOT LINDBERGH BABY Taranaki Daily News, 25 February 1935, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert