Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TESTS OF SOBRIETY

METHODS USED IN GREAT BRITAIN.

INQUIRY INTO THEIR LEGALITY. The present tests of sobriety used by the police in England are likely to be stopped shortly by order of the Home Office. An inquiry into their legality and propriety was lately being made. There is no statutory authority for the tests. A man arrested on a charge of being drunk in charge of a car is not bound to submit to them. But he always does. The tests vary according to the doctor who makes the examination. But there are some that are generally used. The defendant is asked to say “truly rural,” “constitutionally conditional,” “Sister Susie sewing shirts for soldiers,” and other equally difficult phrases. The motorist is made to stand erect, close his eyes, outstretch first his right and then his left arm, and bring his index finger smartly to the tip of his nose. He is ordered to walk, with eyes closed, across a room, toe to heel; then to stand on one leg and hold the other. Walking on a chalk line is another frequent test. A police surgeon in a Police Court in the metropolitan district recently stated that he applied the tests mentioned. When asked to do the finger-to-nose test in the box he failed. He admitted that normal, sober persons might have difficulty in passing his tests. Statistics showed that most of these cases occur between the hours of 11 p.m. and 2 a.m. Doctors have given it as their opinion that arrest and detention may be sufficient shock to produce the thickness of speech and nervous instability which make the passing of the tests altogether impossible.

Mr. Justice Swift has criticised the tests as “utterly unjustifiable.” A well-known K.C. declared that they were “like manufacturing evidence against a defendant—a thing repugnant to the elementary principles of British justice.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19350103.2.173

Bibliographic details

Taranaki Daily News, 3 January 1935, Page 15

Word Count
309

TESTS OF SOBRIETY Taranaki Daily News, 3 January 1935, Page 15

TESTS OF SOBRIETY Taranaki Daily News, 3 January 1935, Page 15

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert