PARITUTU TOURNAMENT

Taranaki Daily News, 21 March 1934, Page 4

PARITUTU TOURNAMENT

FULL ENTRY FOR TO-MORROVR THE DRAW FOR SIX ROUNDS. There is a full entry for the one-day tournament to be held by the Paritutu Bowling Club at its greens to-morrow.,. Play starts at 8.45 a.m., and three rounds will be played morning and afternoon. The draw is:— . First round: W. Vincent. (Paritutu) ▼. Cottier (Inglewood); Neill (Paritutu) ▼. Clarke (Fire Brigade); Douglass (Wert End) v. Spurdie (Inglewood); Jackson (Paritutu) v. Martin (New Plymouth); Boulton (West End) v. Reube (Vogel-.' town); Honeyfield (West End) v. Hill (New Plymouth); Thomson (Paritutu) Boon (New Plymouth); Edwards (Okato). v. Cawthray (Vogeltown); Roebuck (Okato) v. Cuming (Waitara); Bruca (West End) v. Doughty (Fire Brigade);. Christoffel (West End) v. Saunders (New Plymouth); W. Roberts (Paritutu) V. McKenzie (Fitzroy). Second Round: Neill v. Martin; Vincent v. Spurdie; Jackson v. Clarke; Douglas* v. Cottier; Honeyfield v. Cawthray; Thomson v. Reube; Edwards v. Hill; Boulton v. Boon; Bruce v. McKenzie; Roberts v. Saunders; Roebuck v. Doughty; Christoffel v. Cuming. Third Round: . Roebuck v. Clarke; Christoffel v. Martin; Roberts v. Cottier; Bruce v. Spurdie; Vincent v. Cuming;. Neill, v. Doughty; Douglass v. Saunders; Jackson v. McKenzie; Boulton v. Cawthray; Honeyfield v. Boon; Thomson ▼. Hill; Edwards v. Reube. > Fourth Round: Jackson v. Cuming; Douglass v. Doughty; Neill v. Saunders; Vincent v. McKenzie; Roberts v. Martin; Christoffel v. Spurdie; Bruce v. Clarke; . Roebuck v. Cottier; Honeyfield y. Reube; Boulton v. Hill; Edwards v.Kßoon; Thom- . son v. Cawthray. Fifth Round: Boulton v.. McKenzie; Honeyfield v. Saunders; Thomson ▼. Doughty; Edwards v. Cuming; Roebuck v. Hill; Bruce v. Boon; Christoffel V.. Cawthray; Roberts v. Reube; Vincent ▼. Martin; Neill y. Spurdie; Douglass - Clarke; Jackson v. Cottier. -. .... Sixth Round: Christoffel v. Reube; Roberts v. Hill;' Bruce v. Cawthray; Roebuck v. Boon; Thomson v. Saunders; Edwards v. McKenzie; Boulton v. Cuming; Honeyfield v. Doughty; Neill v. Cottier; Vincent vi Clarke; Jackson v. Spurdlef Douglass v.. Martin.