Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BIBLE IN SCHOOLS

ROMAN CATHOLIC ATTITUDE. V ; ~~ -. PASTORAL LETTER. f The . attitude of the Roman Catholic Church in New Zealand toward the ;'■& Bible-in-schools question is sei out in Pastoral Letter by Archbishop Redwood/ \ > which was read in all churches' oin ' ’ Sunday... '.’V- : “For many reasons,” the letter states, “it is desirable that the Catholic clergy , and laity in "this archdiocese should ha vd correct ideas about the question-of the Bible in schools. Accordingly tins brief statement of the case is appropriate. * “In order to teach all men divine truth Jesus • Christ established His Church; a teaching organisation, -to yj. speak to the world in’ His name -’with! His ’’ authority. The teaching - church .J was in existence long before a single . line of the New Testament was written. . It was the teaching church which, gath- j ered together the books of the Bible and officially decided which books long to the’Bible'and which do'not l ' It was the church that through the centuries preserved the Scriptures. The Protestants of the 16thcentury took •;.£ their Bible from the church, arid also . their belief ;in its ‘divine inspiration. • - ~fi “Bible reading" in public schools ' ta : ? -tantamount to thei State’s recognition of the ‘Bible religion’ of Protestants. Aa we all know, ■ Protestantism makes • the - Bible the sole and supreme rule ,of faith and ' morality.. Bible Christianity rgx is a formal denial of the Church,’ of.her ■ divine authority and mission. It strives : to abrogate the> church . which Christ instituted,. and in its place seeks to su,b- .’sstituie a book. . . ' . ’ < “Protestant .Bibles, whether;it be'King''£■ £ James’ version or any other version, . omit seven books from the Old Testament and sections of two other £ namely, . Tobias, Judith, Ecclesiastdcus, | Wisdom, Baruch, 1" and *2 Maccabees, S and sections of Esther and Daniel They > relegate them to an appendix and'label \ them c as ‘apocrypha’ (spdrious. books),;.* diesignation which *'cannot but : Ipwer '\ them in the estimation' of the reader, ’-i/g These books apd "sections; which£Prqtestant versions omit, were in the Bible for 16 centuries. The ’Catholic Church £<£ canonised them and’’ defined their in-J.-J spiration, just as she did for the. other books of the Bible. The Church; still' holds this ancient belief to r thh...'once i-§| united Christian Church.’ Should State/?; and public school authority impose the reading of a Protestant version ' in the, - public schobls, they woiild -thereby.:'*d-’/«$ opt and endorse the Protestant canon ? of Scripture, and with' the', authority 4 ; :.U law and prestige of State -impose' tenet on Catholic taxpayers. The prob- i: lem, then, as to -What Bible -would be ,--’j used in the public - schools, whether ; it - be a Catholic; Protestant, or Jewish'version, offers almost insurmountable diffi- ggculties! " . . . “The plan to. read , only certain passages ' from the . Bible is equally; unsatisfac- •? tpry. By the’ fact that they ' are mere sections, they exclude the Bible-as;,* - whole, and in this way infringe - on th«>j£ religious convictions of Catholics. these selected readings have to be col-j < ourless, so as not to offend anyone. The great New Testament passages , on the Church, the primacy of St; Petery. the?// Real Presence in the Eucharist, would have to be a rion-dogmatic, dilutedrfqrni <4 of Christianity. The Jew, in would oppose everything distinctively ■;? Christian, and insist ufeori the reading* ;sf principally from the Old 1 ’- Testamerit. >, •, Furthermore, the reading of -passages , from the'Bible can hardly be more than . a literary exercise, unless it be accompanied by an interpretation. Now, of supreme importance that Catholic* ?a. should know that interpretation •of inspired books is not a matter - of judgment, and that the church cannot allow anybody to interpret the. Bible for Catholic children who is not t api-S pointed by her and under her control. - “These considerations show’the' prac-J? tlcal imposability of the Bible in school* in- this country, and therefore its -'. condemnation - at the bar of reason and justice. ; “This letter is to be read on Sunday ' at. Mass in all the churches of this ? archdiocese.” ... ■

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19321220.2.130

Bibliographic details

Taranaki Daily News, 20 December 1932, Page 11

Word Count
651

BIBLE IN SCHOOLS Taranaki Daily News, 20 December 1932, Page 11

BIBLE IN SCHOOLS Taranaki Daily News, 20 December 1932, Page 11

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert