Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DECISION AGAINST LANG

DEBTS TO COMMONWEALTH

LEGISLATIVE AMENDMENTS

PENALTIES FOR BREACHES THE POLICY TO BE PURSUED By Telegraph—Press Assn.—Copyright. Sydney, May 5. The High Court has declared that New South Wales owes the Commonwealth £2,029,432. The claim by the State by way of a set-off is refused. A Canberra message states that the Enforcement Act Amendment Bill, which has passed the Senate, provides that in the case of Ministers and proclaimed public authorities, penalties for a breach of the Act will be a fine of £5OO or a year’s imprisonment, or both, on a summary charge, or a fine of £lOOO or three years’ imprisonment or both on an indictable charge. Half of these maximum .penalties will be applied for each day the offence continues. This affects not only Mr. J. T. Lang and Cabinet, but also the Transport Board. The Prime Minister (Mr. J. A. Lyons) said the continued default of the State and its harmful results would force the Commonwealth almost day by day to take some new step to correct the position. “The Commonwealth will continue to pursue this course as long as the State Government continues to default. The Government has decided to attach a portion of the railway and tramway revenues and license fees.” — i “RECALCITRANT LANG AT BAY.” LONDON NEWSPAPER’S COMMENT. London, April 28. “The Commonwealth’s drastic step with regard to the New South Wales revenues should swiftly bring the recalcitrant Mr. Lang to heel.” In a leading article headed ‘‘Mr. Lang at Blay,” the Morning Post expresses this opinion in dealing with the critical condition into which the Premier has brought the State. x "There can be no doubt,” the newspaper says, “that the great majority of Australians in all the States, including New South Wales, are firm in supporting Mr. Lyons’ stubborn defence of the national honour.

“The States are notoriously jealous of Federal encroachments on their sovereignty, and some at first were inclined to take alarm at the powers of attachment the Commonwealth was assuming.

But their fears have been allayed by the universal sense of humiliation that Mr. Lang’s proceedings have inspired, and by the realisation that no State which honourably fulfils its obligations has anything to be afraid of.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19320506.2.64

Bibliographic details

Taranaki Daily News, 6 May 1932, Page 7

Word Count
370

DECISION AGAINST LANG Taranaki Daily News, 6 May 1932, Page 7

DECISION AGAINST LANG Taranaki Daily News, 6 May 1932, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert