Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BOOKING A PURCHASE

ANOTHER NURSE’S ACCOUNT. MAGISTRATE DISMISSES CHARGE. The action of a nurse who purchased some material at a shop and booked it to the account of another nurse without telling her had a sequel in the Magistrate’s Court at Christchurch on Tuesday, when a nurse, whose name was suppressed, was charged with obtaining goods valued at IDs by means of false pretences. Complainant, a nurse employed at the Public Hospital, said she did not authorise any.person to purchase the material. She knew the accused, who was also a nurse' at the hospital. Accused had the opportunity of telling witness that she had put the goods down on her account. Witness denied that she had told accused she could put down' goods on her account at any time she wished. . Accused said it was the practice among nurses to use accounts. As complainant’s friend she thought she could go until the end of the month and then say: “Here is the money for that material,” or else go into the shop and pay before the bill was due. She had the money and intended to pay. The magistrate: What pay do you get at the hospital? Accused: £3 10s a month. Answering an inquiry from the magistrate Dr. Fox, medical superintendent at the hospital, said he understood it was the practice among certain groups of nurses to use each other’s accounts. The Magistrate: Have you made any inquiries since this case. Dr. Fox: No. We were awaiting the decision in this action. What 1 have heard is only rumoured. The Magistrate: But it makes some difference to us. The chief detective said a detective interviewed the matron on the point and she said she knew of no such practice. Dr. "Fox said he and the matron were both of opinion that it was not a criminal act, but just carelessness. “I think this is a case where the name should be suppressed,” said the magistrate, in dismissing the charge.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19300814.2.100

Bibliographic details

Taranaki Daily News, 14 August 1930, Page 13

Word Count
330

BOOKING A PURCHASE Taranaki Daily News, 14 August 1930, Page 13

BOOKING A PURCHASE Taranaki Daily News, 14 August 1930, Page 13

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert