Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

OUTLAWRY OF SUBMARINE

FEELING OF THE NATIONS FRANCE REMAINS SCEPT-DAL SYMPATHY FROM BRITAIN By Telegraph—Press Assn.—Copyright. Received Feb. 7, 8.55 p.m. A. and N.Z. London, Feb. 6. Opinion in well-informed circles, obtained by the Daily Telegraph, emphasises the point that Britain, despite her possession of an efficient fleet of submarines, second to none and forming an important link in Imperial defence, would be glad to renounce them provided all countries followed the example, but if a single Power stands out the schenie must collapse. The case of France is instanced. With 91 submarines in her current programme, France is basing her main system of defence upon these craft. It would be difficult to convince France that the States and Japan would give up theirs. The prevalent idea is that had America supported Britain at the Washington conference the Anglo-American combined influence might have succeeded in securing universal abandonment. The Paris correspondent of the Morning Post Bays many columns of newsprint are being devoted to the commemoration of the 150th anniversary of the Franco-American treaty relations and the signature of the new arbitration treaty. As though not desiring to spoil the occasion the Press almost entirely ignored Mr. Kellogg's suggestion for the abolition of submarines. No official proposal on the subject has yet been received. France will undoubtedly reply that she is willing to destroy her submarines if the United States destroys Its dreadnoughts. Mr. Kellogg's proposition, following on the heels of the new capital ship programme, appears to France to be merely a poor election dodge,” says the correspondent, “Even Litvinoff’s sweeping disarmament proposition at Geneva is regarded as preferable to Mr. Kellogg’s suggestion. Litvinoff at any rate made a suggestion of all-round reduction, not a scheme hitting some navies severely and not touching others.” A.P.A. and Sun. Paris, Feb. 0. “Mr. Kellogg is wasting his time,” says the Quotidien, pointing out that the submarine is the only weapon with which countries with small navies can defend themselves against dreadnoughts and cruisers. If Mr. Kellogg’s proposal were accepted he would gain a signal triumph, clearing away the last obstacle to the tyranny of the seas dreamed of by American imperialists.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19280208.2.63

Bibliographic details

Taranaki Daily News, 8 February 1928, Page 7

Word Count
360

OUTLAWRY OF SUBMARINE Taranaki Daily News, 8 February 1928, Page 7

OUTLAWRY OF SUBMARINE Taranaki Daily News, 8 February 1928, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert