Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WOMEN’S STOCKINGS.

A LEGISLATOR’S IGNORANCE. (By Wire—Parliamentary Reporter.) Wellington, Last Night. Sir Thomas Mackenzie declined to commit himself in the Legislative Conncii this afternoon to an admission that he took much notice of the fair sex, at any rate of their lower limbs. Replying to Sir Francis Bell, Sir Thomas said that expert opinion in England was that artificial silk was not likekly to interfere with wool to any considerable extent. ‘What about silk stockings as against wool?’ asked the Hon. Mark Cohen. Sir Thomas: “I never look at silk Blockings.” •Women patronise artificial silk; that’s the worst of it,” remained Mr. Cohen. “Well, you know better than I do,” Jras the retort of Sir Thomas.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19250704.2.93.2

Bibliographic details

Taranaki Daily News, 4 July 1925, Page 16

Word Count
116

WOMEN’S STOCKINGS. Taranaki Daily News, 4 July 1925, Page 16

WOMEN’S STOCKINGS. Taranaki Daily News, 4 July 1925, Page 16

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert