S.M. COURT.
Monday, 9:h September.—Beforj Mr* E. L. Bfanford,8 f anford, S M. JODGMBMT FOB PLAI.mm. Heary Weston v. Oharles F. Ooike. —Claim for go ids and two dishonoured | acceptances, £32 12s 103, and cists £2 l 14s, EUrbour Boird v. Oharles £. Brewer.—C'ltim £1 Is, costs ss. DEFENDED CASH. F. Do'aerty v. J. O'DfiVoH - Plaintiff was pnr<er at the Commonwealth Hott l, claimed 19s 6d for wages due. It app'ars the defendant bad a dispute with pKintiff over attending to | the fires, refuting in (,liiiititf being Uncharged, when defendant would only pay 6s for wuce?. According to de-1 feid\nc the plaintiff failed t"at<md thofi-ea, tb»t being part of his duty, j lieing out one day i<lain'iff found on his retu'n that the parbur ire whs out, and when he compl lined of (his the defendant gave cheek, so wa* dismissed, , His Worsh'p, without hesit - tion, gave judgment for defendant.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19010910.2.10
Bibliographic details
Taranaki Daily News, Volume XXIII, Issue 201, 10 September 1901, Page 2
Word Count
149S.M. COURT. Taranaki Daily News, Volume XXIII, Issue 201, 10 September 1901, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in