Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ARBITRATION COURT'S OPINION.

TWO DECK HANDS IN WATCH NOT

ESSENTIAL

tCNITED rREoB ASSOCIATION.]

Wellington, Oct. 17. The Arbitration Court gave its judgment to-day, dealing with the interpretation of \ the- points in dispute in the agreement between the coastal shipown:&rs and tho.seamen. ..The points were, decided in favour of the employers' view of the agreement in regard'to women- in a watch. Tho Court doubted -its jurisdiction to deal.^vvith I.hequos:tion, but expressed the opinion that, on the vessels in question, it was not essential to safety to have two .-fleck hands in a watch in addition to' art officer.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TC19171018.2.42.1

Bibliographic details

Colonist, Volume LVIII, Issue 14540, 18 October 1917, Page 6

Word Count
97

ARBITRATION COURT'S OPINION. Colonist, Volume LVIII, Issue 14540, 18 October 1917, Page 6

ARBITRATION COURT'S OPINION. Colonist, Volume LVIII, Issue 14540, 18 October 1917, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert