Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TOHUNGAISM.

A MAORI DOCTOR FINED

A case of alleged tohungaism was heard at the Patea Court the other day. A young Maori, named Poi Awarua-, was charged with having pretended to cure disease by supernatural powers, this being an ofFence under the Tohunga Suppression Act, 1898. It -was stated that a Maori woman from Parewanui had come to Little Taranaki to be treated by the divine healer, and that she had died. Another young Maori woman maintained that Poi had treated her and had put tea and mixed potatoes on her head, whilst another man, who believed he had an evil spirit, was alleged to have been hit on the nose and then made to drink his own blood with the object of driving out the evil spirit.

For the defence it was stated that the Maori woman from Parewanui had not been treated by Poi. The young Maori woman who claimed to have had tea poured on her head, was alleged to be suffering from swollen eyes, which had all the appearance of having been caused by blows, and when Poi saw her he bathed her eyes with tea, but did nothing beyond that. With regard to the case of driving out the evil spirit, it was maintained that the man in question had violently assaulted Poi. Several young fellows rushed him, and he was struck on the nosey and this accounted for the bleeding, but the drinking of blood was stoutly denied. Two witnesses • for Poi maintained that the defendant had never pretended to possess supernatural powers. He*was a preacher, however, and had exhorted the Maoris to give up ths worship of Maori idols and the gods of their- ancestors. .

The-magistrate accepted the evidence of the prosecution, and fined defendant £10 and costs. He said that he would have imposed a term of imprisonment instead of a fine were it not for the fact that defendant did not make money out of his practice.—Auckland "Herald." ,

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TC19141006.2.11

Bibliographic details

Colonist, Volume LVI, Issue 13592, 6 October 1914, Page 2

Word Count
327

TOHUNGAISM. Colonist, Volume LVI, Issue 13592, 6 October 1914, Page 2

TOHUNGAISM. Colonist, Volume LVI, Issue 13592, 6 October 1914, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert