Sydenham Licensing Case.
•''^♦CHBisT&HimOTi ,Dhdm6€t 14. Another, oaae/wwiug oat of the Sydenbam lioenßing trouble waa befow.lhe Sapreme fox&Jp-fai,.UubM&M%i&M, olthflC^tawn H9«u^»CpailiDg agaioßttbebdeobion ot/Ahe Ifcl^i-Mfglalrtte fining bim lor aa alleged ill^uMUe of liqaor. The Msgiatrate held tbM m tho Sppteme Conit hadtulea that the Commtttoa aokdlllegillv in'tne isane of the liorife; Htffield bad broken the law by ■riliOff.'ToeHadfield,itwilcoritended'that tjntiiolh«li««nw was formally qaasHed' no offiOMneonld b« committed. Ooanßil for B^dftAld to-day applied for an adjournment of the om« till the Privy Connoil hid deWa&ff ri the case relative to the Committee from Ooort oTAppeal. Connael for the ProbibitioiUßta opposed, and Mr Jostiae Denniston, after hearing argument, reserved hia aecifion.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TC18931215.2.13.11
Bibliographic details
Colonist, Volume XXXVII, Issue 7814, 15 December 1893, Page 4
Word Count
106Sydenham Licensing Case. Colonist, Volume XXXVII, Issue 7814, 15 December 1893, Page 4
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in