Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LORD GRANVILLE'S DESPATCH.

The following is Lord Granville's latest despatch to the G-overnor of New Zealand. It is dated Downing-street, October 7 : —

Sin —Before this despatch reaches you you will hare received my answer to your telegram of the 7th of August, in which you inform me that the General Assembly haa passed resolutions praying for the detention of the 18th Begiinent "as a garrison and moral support," and that an act has passed " binding the Colony to pay whatever contribution the Imperial Government may demand."

I have now before me your despatch No. 103, of the sth August, in "which you enclose, among other papers, copies of those resolutions and of the act passed in accordance with them.

I remark that the act and the resolutions do not exactly correspond with what your telegram had led me to expect.

They do not refer to the detention of the troops "as garrison or moral support"—very important, ■words—as indicating, if they had been used, that the Assembly did not require her Mnjosty's troops to move out of the principal towns or military stations, or to engage in active service. The act and resolutions, however, merely speak of pecuniary contribution. And, further, I could not hut suppose from the terms of your telegram that the Q-eneral Assembly prayed her Majesty's Government to allow the 18th Kegiinent to be detained for some indefinite period in New Zealand, and had pledged itself to pay such contribution as her Majesty's Government might deuiaud for that indefinite detention,

But it now appears that the prayer of the resolutions is not addressed to her Majesty's Government, but virtually to Sir Trevor Chute, who is requested to retain the troops till the decision of her Majesty's Government is known, and that the act only assures him that the Colony will, if required, contribute towards the support of the troops, pendiug that decision. K"o offer or pledge is made directly or indirectly, by the Government or by the legislature, that the Colony will aoeept the decision of the home Government respecting the terms on which the troops are to be finally stationed in New Zealand.

The question substantially raised by these papers has been considered with the attention which its importance demands, and, as you are already aware, h,er Majesty's Government have felt bound to adhere to the decision already communicated to you, that the Queen's trcops should not be employed in the present hostilities.

I do not under-rate the arguments which may be urged in favor of that employment. They are obvious in themselves, and have been forcibly urged by yourself and others; but the objections to that course are overwhelming.

All experience, and not least the experience of Hew Zealand itself, has shown the fatal consequences of carrying on war under a divided authority. It can but lead to continued differences, imperfect co-opera-tion, _ interrupted enterprises, and the other evils which are alleged to have characterised the Maori war.

The British and Colonial troops must, therefore, be placed under the came command.

But, on the one hand, her Majesty's Government are under a responsibility for the safety and honor and discipline of British troops which they cannot transfer to a Colonial Ministry ; and, on the other hand, they could not assume the conduct of a war, to be carried on ostensibly at the expense of the Colony, without making themselves chargeable for its ill Buccess, and entitling the colonists to expect that it would be prosecuted at the expense, if necessary, of this country to a successful issue.

It may, indeed, be said that the British troops might, in accordance with the conditions at present insisted on by her Majesty's Government, and suggested by your telegram, remain in the Colony for the mere purpose of holding certain towns or military stations ; but such an arrangement could not, I think, be really maintained. If disasters are apprehended it is impossible to suppose that the British regiment would not be counted on by the colonists as part of the force they have always available to avert or retrieve them ; and if these disasters really occur, it is practically certain that, in the absence of other sufficient force, the regiment will be so used. The alternative will then recur which I have shown to be inadmisaable. Either this country must place its troops at the command of a government not responsible to itself, or it must assume the responsibility of the war, or it must resign itself to the disasters consequent on a double government. And these considerations derive increased weight from the circumstances of New Zealand. If the active employment of British troops in a Colony in which responsible government has been established under ordinary circumstances is fraught with difficulties, it is still more objectionable when the presence of these troops is calculated to encourage the Colonial Government in a policy which the home Government have always regarded as pregnant with danger.

The preaenfc distress of the Colony arises mainly from two circumstances—the discontent of the nativea consequent on the confiscation, of their la,ud, and negleot'of successive OoTwmniootjQ to place on foot a

: :':!'.■■.■> sufficiently formidable to overawe that rlig, I . ..ufceut. "•' •''■.•.:.,■■■.;•.■.■■:. \- ."-, ..■■ ? That the discontent of, the natives (loos rnahily a-nso : 'ram the confiscation of their lands is manifest.-. The • 'vighborhood of Tauranga and-other confiscated disi (-.riots on the East Coast is that in which.Te Kooti j maintains himself.,. In..Tarannb' your -own officer i states that " the larger and more generally < operative incitement to rebellion is the hope of recovering lands and status" while the restoration of the large extent; of land confiscated in the WaifoUo unequivocally put forward by the advisers of the so-called Maori King as the condition of pacification. These being the sources of the danger to which the Colony is exposed from the natives, it is pressed upon her Majesty's G-overnment that the task of reducing the natives is beyond the strength of the Colony 1; and this is conclusively shown both by the experience of the laßt war, in which, as you have frequently observed, the Colonial forces had the assistance of nearly 10,000 regular troops, and by the present state of the Jforth Island, where a few hundred insurgents suffice to impose a ruinous insecurity on large numbers of settlers and a ruinous expenditure on the Colony. Meanwhile, I perceive that the average strength of the Colonial forces on foot during the year preceding the commencement of these disturbances hardly erceeded 700 men, having, in the month of March, been allowed to fall to 496, and although it has been of late greatly increased and improved, yet that your present Ministry on its accession to office contem« plated its speedy reduction.

Large concessions, therefore, are unavoidable to appease a pervading (discontent with.which the Colony is otherwise unable to cope, and still larger concessions will be required.unless a force is kept on foot capable of commanding.the respect of the natives when the Queen s troops are withdrawn.

- But the abandonment of land,. the recognition of Maori authority, and the maintenance of an expensive force, however indispensible some or all of these may be, are distasteful remedies, which will not be resorted to while the Colony continues to expect assistance from this country, and a decision to supply the Colony even with the prestige of British troops, obfectionable as I have shown it to be on grounds of practical principle, would, .in my yievr, be also immediately injurious to the settlers themselves, as tending to delay their adoption of those prudent counsels on which, as I think, the restoration of the Northern Island depends.

Ifc is in no spirit of controversy that I make these remarks. I should not gratuitously have criticised the proceedings of the Colonial Government, who are entitled to the entire management of their own affairs. But this country is asked for assistance ; it is asked for assistance to sustain a policy which it does not direct, and which it is not able to foresee. Upon such a state of facts many questions arise; and among them it becomes material to inquire whether that assistance is for the real advantage of those who seek it. Judging froii the best materials lit ray command, I am satisfied that it is not so, aud it is riot the part of a true friend of the colonists, by continuing a delusive shadow of support, to divert their attention from that course in which then- real safety lies —the course of deliberately measuring their own resources, and, at whatever immediate sacrifice, adjusting their policy to them.

It is not then without a full sense of the responsibility which attaches to her Majesty's Government in deciding on this important question, nor without a firm belief that they are discharging that responsibility in the manner most conducive to the interests of this country and of the inhabitants of NewZealand, that they will instruct Sir T. Chute, in terms which shall preclude the continuance of any such doubt and surmises as you report to exist in some quarters, not further to delay the execution of the orders which he lias received for the removal of the 18th Eegiment from New Zealand. If those orders are now promptly executed her Majes'y'a Government will not exercise the powers vested in them by the recent act of charging against tiie Colony the cost of the delay which has been incurred.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TC18700118.2.38

Bibliographic details

Colonist, Volume XIII, Issue 1285, 18 January 1870, Page 7

Word Count
1,566

LORD GRANVILLE'S DESPATCH. Colonist, Volume XIII, Issue 1285, 18 January 1870, Page 7

LORD GRANVILLE'S DESPATCH. Colonist, Volume XIII, Issue 1285, 18 January 1870, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert