Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Disposal of Wedding Gifts

The question of w’hich party to separation between husband and w’ife should have the wedding presents was referred to in the Supreme Court at Hamilton on Wednesday, when Mr Justice Finlay remarked that there was a singular dearth of authorities on the subject. Both counsel agreed, and one suggested that a usual course followed on such occasions was for the wife to take the wedding gifts made by her relatives and friends, while the husband took those given by his relatives and friends. Opposing counsel said he had heard of cases where the parties “tossed” for possession, the winner having first choice. Tn is brought the remark from His Honour that counsel might look up authorities on the subject.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TAWC19491125.2.9

Bibliographic details

Te Awamutu Courier, Volume 79, Issue 7137, 25 November 1949, Page 4

Word Count
123

Disposal of Wedding Gifts Te Awamutu Courier, Volume 79, Issue 7137, 25 November 1949, Page 4

Disposal of Wedding Gifts Te Awamutu Courier, Volume 79, Issue 7137, 25 November 1949, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert