Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT.

TO-DAY'S SITTING. BEPAIRS TO A HOTJSE. In the Supreme Court ease of J. Lee and Sous v. Emma Louisa Clarke, a claim for £23 1/7, alleged to be due for repairs to a house, his Honour Mr Justice Denniston this afternoon gave judgment for the defendant, with costs. DE, DE RENZI'S ESTATE; "Reserved decision was delivered in the case of tie Kenzi v. de Rcnzi. The case 'was brought under the Family Protection Act, and concerned the estate of the late Dr Arthur de Renzi. The plaintiffs were Dora Harman de Renzi and Frances Emily de Reuzi, both of London, spinsters, and daughters of the late Pr de Renzi by hi 3 first wife, and the defendant was Jane

do, Renzi, of Christchurch, widow. After reviewing the circumstances, his Honour awarded each party £6OO.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNCH19150413.2.67

Bibliographic details

Sun (Christchurch), Volume II, Issue 366, 13 April 1915, Page 8

Word Count
136

SUPREME COURT. Sun (Christchurch), Volume II, Issue 366, 13 April 1915, Page 8

SUPREME COURT. Sun (Christchurch), Volume II, Issue 366, 13 April 1915, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert