Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BANKRUPT BUILDER

CROWN SOLICITOR TO BE CALLED IN “UNSATISFACTORY BUSINESS' (Special to THE SUN) CHRISTCHURCH. Today. About 30 creditors were present *%t a meeting held yesterday to discuss the bankrupt estate of Bernard Repnell. a well-known Christchurch builder. The meeting decided that the Crown solicitor should be asked to investigate Rennell's affairs. Claims had been made by 94 creditors, said Mr. A. \V. Watters, the ©flicial assignee, and debts totalled approximately £4.858. According to bankrupt’s statement he had assets worth £4OO and £298 was due to him in payments for contracts. However, only about £US of this would be collected. Mr. H. Bradley said he had heard that some of bankrupt s contracts were very loosely worded. The official assignee told the meetirg that the only assets upon which it was possible to realise were contract payments totalling £I4S and chattels worth £IOO. Of this, preferential claims for rent and wages would absorb £133, leaving £lls for ordinary creditors, or a payment of 5d in the poundAt the last meeting there had been £1,847 to account for, £4lO of which was drawings. “It confirms the opinion I expressed at the last meeting. ’’ said Mr. Watters, "that bankrupt did not know where he stood.” Bankrupt maintained that if his creditors had given him a better hearing he could have pulled through. Mr. Bradley moved that a public examination of bankrupt and his sifairs be held, but withdrew his motion in favour of an amendment that the case be referred to the Crown solicitor. This amendment was carried. The assignee said he thought ti.e i methods used in carrying on the bus- ! ness had been unsatisfactory, but that there was not enough evidence to warrant a prosecution.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19290822.2.137

Bibliographic details

Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 748, 22 August 1929, Page 10

Word Count
285

BANKRUPT BUILDER Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 748, 22 August 1929, Page 10

BANKRUPT BUILDER Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 748, 22 August 1929, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert