Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BROPHY CASE

CONFLICTING STORIES PAPERS AT FAULT. Alleged Discrepancies And Departure From Fact. NOT ACCIDENTALLY SHOT Press Association —Copyright. Melbourne, June 13 The wounding of Police Superintendent Brophy in Royal Park was furthe: investigated before the commission of inquiry to-day. Detective-Inspector A. T. McKerral chief of the Criminal Investigation Department, gave evidence regarding conflicting stories of the wounding of Mr. Brophy and the measures adopted to clear the matter up as "newspapers on the Monday following the shooting published information in which there were discrepancies and departures from fact." The shooting was originally believed to have been accidental but later Detective Carey told Mr. McKerral he had seen Mr. Brophy in hospital and ascertained it was hot accidental. Sir Thomas Blarney, Chief Police Commissioner. then instructed Mr. McKerral to correct the accident story and give the newspapers the true facts.

Mr. Stretton, who is assisting the commissioner, asked: "If a n informer rang you in order to make an appointmen! to tell you about a prospective bank hold-up would you meet him right on the steps of that bank?"—"Probably not." ' "Would you, as Mr. Brophy purports to have done, meet an informer right in the centre of the area where motor bandits were operating ''—"The circumstances are different. You have usually to keep an appointment at the spot named by the informer. Otherwise he will not come.". ;,. Mr., McKerral added that he saw nothing wrong in what Mr. Brophy did. It was quite good detective work. The doctor attending Mr. Brophy believed the whole thing was accidental; despite the fact that the wounds were widely distributed. Detective-Sergeant H. Carey detailed efforts he made to find out the facts of the shooting. He said Mr. Brcphy was doubtful whether he could identify his assailants, but he, hoped to pick up an informer who might help. DetectiveSergeant Carey added that as a resuli of his investigations he now planned to take "certain action in a certain direction, but it was not desirable to divulge what was going oil." Mr. Stretton: "Do you agree with Mr. Brophy that the name of the informer in this case is sacred? Mr. Carey:' "I do. Detective CVKeefe is at this moment obtaining information that might be of value."

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19360616.2.51

Bibliographic details

Stratford Evening Post, Volume IV, Issue 158, 16 June 1936, Page 6

Word Count
372

BROPHY CASE Stratford Evening Post, Volume IV, Issue 158, 16 June 1936, Page 6

BROPHY CASE Stratford Evening Post, Volume IV, Issue 158, 16 June 1936, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert