'THAT'S THAT'
DISPUTE ABOUT FLAGS
NEW YORK, May. 15
Sir Charles Higham, the British advertising experfcy has asked the “Now York Times’’ why, as Major F'itznia.unioo a Loyal' British /su;b( jeet no British flag was displayed in the decorations of Chicago and ..Now ipi-h,, and if whe»*. (.Lionel; Lindbergh was' received in London, .the British h,ut displayed no United States flags, “what would have been said in New York?” . ■ ,\(r Grover Whalen, the secretary of {hq Mayor’s reception, characterised Sir Charles as “all wet,” and his question a, s absurd. . “Major Fitzmanricq was ah officer of the Irish Free, State, B Jig,, said, as such was honored by, the flags of the Irish Free State. , Tbfrt’s all there is to that,” added Whalen.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19280529.2.46
Bibliographic details
Stratford Evening Post, Issue 64, 29 May 1928, Page 6
Word Count
123'THAT'S THAT' Stratford Evening Post, Issue 64, 29 May 1928, Page 6
Using This Item
Copyright undetermined – untraced rights owner. For advice on reproduction of material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.