Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ANTI-RACE DISCRIMINATION.

Ou September Ist tlioft* went into of-, 1 feet in New York State one of the I most sweeping “equal rights” or anti- I race discriiuination laws on the' l Slatnle-hooks of the several States, i * This law was aimed particularly at 1 T hotels and restaurants which have r harred their doors to Hebrews ami 1 negroes, although the Chinese and s other peoples that are unwelcome in h some public places will profit equally. I with these two* races from enforce- n incut of the law, if that proves to lie 1 e possible. Coder the old statute such t ) discrimination was a misdemeanour, t a hut a negro who was refused admis- 1 p don at a “white man’s” barber shop, I tr a Chinese who was denied the privil- y| >ges of a saloon frequented by whites, ]( was obliged to prove actual damage '0 •eceived as the result of this discrimin- 0 ilion in order to get redress in a civil iciion. ruder the new law, however,' fp he person discriminated against is, 1 a nioii proof of such discrimination, to I

receive a sum of from one hundred to j live hundred dollars trom the person that infringed tin' statute, the size of. the line to lie determined by the court : and the culprit is also to he deemed, guilty of misdemeanour, and subject-j ed to a further line oi live hundred dollars for every ollenee. or to imprisonment lor a term ol trom thirty to ninety days, or to both line and | imprisonment. What gives the law; unusual force is the prohibition ol all discriminatory advertising. It will be_ interesting to observe whether the re-! I'nsal of an hotel clerk to grant an j undesirable visitor accommodation on j the time-worn excuse that “the house is full” will be held to constitute an “indirect refusal,” and, in fact, whether a law so flatly opposed to certain strong prejudices will ho capable of enforcement. It cannot he enforced unless it is supported by a strong public opinion is yet definite enough on lie opinion, and it is questionable whether public opinion is yet definite enough on this question to reinforce so drastic a law is the opinion expressed by the New York Outlook.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19131117.2.14

Bibliographic details

Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXVII, Issue 65, 17 November 1913, Page 4

Word Count
380

ANTI-RACE DISCRIMINATION. Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXVII, Issue 65, 17 November 1913, Page 4

ANTI-RACE DISCRIMINATION. Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXVII, Issue 65, 17 November 1913, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert