Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NOT NECESSARILY WRONG.

(To the Editor, “Stratford Post.”) Sir, —In reply to Mr Masters’ remarks re a councillor not working in the best interests of the purchase of the Supply Co.’s undertaking, it docs not follow that this councillor, or others, are not working in the best interests of the ratepayers, and also that because they differ from Mr Masters in opinion, that they must therefore be wronu.—l am, etc,, ANOTHEII RATEPAYER.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19110803.2.43.2

Bibliographic details

Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXIX, Issue 138, 3 August 1911, Page 6

Word Count
72

NOT NECESSARILY WRONG. Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXIX, Issue 138, 3 August 1911, Page 6

NOT NECESSARILY WRONG. Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXIX, Issue 138, 3 August 1911, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert