CORRESPONDENCE. THE CASEIN INDUSTRY. “NO NIBBLES.” MR. HINE AND THE TOTALISATOR

Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXIX, Issue 131, 26 July 1911, Page 5

CORRESPONDENCE.

THE CASEIN INDUSTRY.

“NO NIBBLES.”

MR. HINE AND THE TOTALISATOR

(To the Editor “Stratford Post.”) Sir,—An interesting article by Mr. T’bos. O. Hodgson, on cue nianulacuire of casein and casein products, recently appeared m your columns. Lucre are, However, several statements'winch, although they may have ijoen correct of too processes Mr. Hodgson investigated some years ago, are incorrect wnen applied to trie processes and rights recently .acquired, by tire jN.E. Casein Company. Our aim light through has been to secure a process by which a useful liquid (or whey) is returned to suppliers, and if Mr. Hodgson or any otner interested milk producer, will call at the company's Aramono office, the value of this casein liquid will be demonstrated to them. The following points in connection with our process and casein generally may interest your readers, and allay any misconceptions raised bv the letter under review :

"1, We do not use any rennet, sulphuric, or any other commercial acid. 2. We do not interfere with the sugar contents, but return it intact with tlie liquid; 3. By the addition of a proteid .substance we are enabled to return a liquid almost equal to skim-milk in food value. 4. By adopting our process milk producers are enabled to retain their calves and pigs, and in addition receive Bid per lb butter fat (in whole milk), extra for the casein contents of their skim. 5. We arc neither guessing or experimenting, but working on processes which have received several tests in other parts of the world. 6. Under the proposals submitted to the dairy companies they will own the plants, and in the course of time have full control of them. Wo cannot further discuss this matter per medium of the press, but will at all limes be most happy to supply full information privately- to any interested parties. By publishing the above you will remove some doubts, and possibly assist in establishing another industry in your nourishing centre. Thanking you in anticipation, We are, etc.., N.Z. CASEIN CO., F. tv. WICKERMAN, Manager'.' Aramoho, July 25th, 1911.

(To the Editor “Stratford Post.”) Sir,— Kindly allow me space to. thank “County Hanger” for the valued information he gives me. It must bo that those wicked teamsters have boon taking a mean advantage oi our straightforward ranger and his assistant. For when 1 last wrote is was a common sight in the evening to sec teamsters from our neighbouring County driving their bullocks well up into Stratford County and leaving them until next morning, when they would take them away again. But since then they are not so often seen. Perhaps they (the teamsters) take the “Stratford Post,” and got a fright. I again thank yon in anticipation, hut am awfully sorry there can lie no nibble for yours, etc., NEW CHUM. Mahoe, July 24th, 1911. I

(To the Editor “Stratford Post. ')

Sir, —The supporters and friends _of Mr. Hine can hardly feel satisfied with his attitude on the question of the totalisator. Adherents of racing will naturally he pleased with the in a labor’s intentions, hut students of logic will be greatly puzzled to follow Mr. Hina’s lino of reasoning. The n.ember stated clearly that he is strongly opposed to the totalisator, ano, Author, it is fairly well laio.vn thatlm makes a point of refusing ary invitations that may he extended to him to attend race meetings, yet, notwirastanding his strong objection to i.ie racecourse and the totalis itor in paiticular, he calmly statcs_ that shomd the question of the abolition of the totalisator be fought out on the Turn of the House he will vote lor retention of the machine. Mr. hiiuo stated in extenuation of his intern md action that he would vote tor the tote until such time as the bookmaker was more dead than at present, dust low it is possible to kill the bookie moie dead than lie is at present it is culficult to imagine, unless eicli member of the tribe is literally killed ".ith an axe. Hereafter surely Mr. Hine can never lay claim to cither logic of consistency ‘ to put the mattei plainly. Mr. Hine has not_ had in this matter the courage of Ids opinion, ami Ins action can'only he regard'd as a pcatical makeshift. — I am, etc.. AN bbhCToR. I Stratford, July 25th, 1011.