SUPREME COURT.
NEW PLYMOUTH SESSIONS. The Now Plymouth sessions will open to-morrow morning at It o’clock before Mr Justice Edwards. The c! oases is lengthy, and, as the Court will hardly sit on Coronation Day, night sittings will probably ,»e necessary if the session is to end this week. Of course some of the ci.'l cases may not come on for hearing. The list is as follows: CRIMINAL OASES. Ilex V. Albert Edward Madgwick, a, charge of cattle stealing. Ilex v. Lewis John Peppered, charged with carnally knowing a girl under sixteen years of age. Rex v. Alexander Blue, a charge of house-breaking at Kawera. Rex v. Munga Wainonga, a charge of breaking and entering a shop at Okaiawa and committing theft. CIVIL CASES. Quin Bros. (Mr Halliwell) v. South Taranaki Winter Sliow Company, Ltd., and Robert William Bond nci Bond’s trustees, a claim under the Wages Protection and Contractors Liens Act, IOOSj for £lB6 16s 7d. Bennett and Sutton (Mr 11. 1). Welsh) v. the same, a similar claim, for £303 12s 4d. W. Humphries v. Westport Coal Company, Ltd., claim for '2IOOO dam - ages for injuries received by being knocked down by a cart and horse belonging to defendant company (to bo heard before a common jury). Willie Greenwood (Mr Spence) v. Win. Schrnit and Win. Bcllshaw G\lr Quilliam), claim for £271 compensation for deficiency /of grass lands involved in a sale of property .at Okan. Joseph Henry Slight v. Charles Arnold and Lucy Hannah Arnold, claim for refund of a deposit if £so■ paid under an agreement for sale of land and stock for £230 !3s 2d loss and .damages suffered in consequence of alleged revision of the contract. George Maginners v. Carl A Zurcher and Alf. Zurcher, claim for £125 damages for breach of warranty on a sale of cattle. Rasmus Anderson v. John George Buchanan, claim for £5Ol lamages for seduction of plaintiff’s daughter (to bo heard before a common jury). Mary Ann Cray v. Beniamin Gray, as administrators of the estate ofBenjamin Gray, deceased, and Elisabeth Greenlees, action in detinue for possession of certain cattle or for £313 in case possession cannot bo had, and £2O damages. DIVORCE. Augustus Cameron v. Daisy Cameron and Harold Kirk. IN BANCO. Re the Law Practitioners Act, 1908, and a solicitor, motion for rule nisi to strike off the roll of solicitors. William George Malone v. Henry Samuel Fitzherbcrt, Registrar of the Supreme Court, motion for a writ of mandamus.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19110619.2.16.16
Bibliographic details
Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXIX, Issue 101, 19 June 1911, Page 5
Word Count
412SUPREME COURT. Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXIX, Issue 101, 19 June 1911, Page 5
Using This Item
Copyright undetermined – untraced rights owner. For advice on reproduction of material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.