Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PROHIBITION ORDERS.

AX APPLICATION REFUSED. (Por Press AftsooiatiouA Wellington, May 2!. t An unusual case was before .the Magistrate tliis morning, when an employer sought to obtain a prohibition older against an employee on the ground that the latter had mot with an accident some time ago, and his drinking habits were retarding, his recovery. The Magistrate considered the evidence did not show; that dofendaht drank to and dlshiissfctl tlui Itbiillctiihmr ’ ;! r:i !| io •/

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19110524.2.34.15

Bibliographic details

Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXIX, Issue 80, 24 May 1911, Page 6

Word Count
73

PROHIBITION ORDERS. Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXIX, Issue 80, 24 May 1911, Page 6

PROHIBITION ORDERS. Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXIX, Issue 80, 24 May 1911, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert