Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ANGLO-BELGIAN TALKS

DELICATE SITUATION GERMAN THREAT MAY CAUSE DIPLOMATIC RIFT (United Press Assn.—Telegraph Copyright) (Received March 7, 6.30 p.m.) LONDON, March 6. Conversations are proceeding through diplomatic channels between London and Brussels over the delicate situation arising in connection with Belgian neutrality. It is feared that with the receding chances of a Western European pact Herr Hitler’s promise to respect Belgium’s territorial integrity may divorce Belgium from Britain and France. The Belgian Prime Minister (Dr Paul van Zeeland) is anxious to maintain the Anglo-French-Belfeian front, but pressure by the pro-Fascist Rexists, led by M. Leon Degrelle, complicates the situation, a solution of which the British and Belgian governments are endeavouring to reach. The Brussels correspondent of The Times says that public opinion in Belgium is becoming increasingly apprehensive lest the diplomatic stalemate in Western Europe furnishes Herr Hitler with a pretext for a new manoeuvre, making Belgium’s position even more difficult than it has been since the violation of the Locarno Pact by Germany. On October 15 King Leopold announced Belgium’s intention of pursuing a neutral policy. The diplomatic correspondent of The Daily Telegraph said then that the future of Belgium in a new European system had been under examination in London recently. It was held that should Germany attempt expansion it would be eastwards; her concern in the west would be to hold off an attack from France going to help Poland or Czechoslovakia. The observation of neutrality by Belgium would lighten the German task. German opinion welcomed King Leopold’s speech as an indication of the inexpediency of the Franco-Soviet Pact. The Manchester Guardian said that Belgian neutrality would not necessarily prevent a new Western European pact, for the other four Powers might agree to guarantee her neutrality without asking for reciprocal guarantees, as was the case before 1914. It would, however, prevent the suggested pact between France, Britain and Belgium from coming into force if the negotiations failed. France shortly afterwards decided to extend the Maginot Line of forts along the Belgian frontier to the North Sea.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ST19370308.2.55

Bibliographic details

Southland Times, Issue 23142, 8 March 1937, Page 7

Word Count
339

ANGLO-BELGIAN TALKS Southland Times, Issue 23142, 8 March 1937, Page 7

ANGLO-BELGIAN TALKS Southland Times, Issue 23142, 8 March 1937, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert