Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BASIC WAGE

TEN PER CENT. CUT NOT TO BE RESTORED NEW METHOD OF ADJUSTMENT (United Press Assn.—Telegraph Copyright.) Melbourne, May 6. Three judges of the Full Court of the Arbitration Court in a reserved judgment, refused to restore the 10 per cent, reduction applied to all awards of the court in 1931, but a majority of the court decided that a new method of adjusting the Federal basic wage in accordance with the cost of living be adopted by using the “all items” table instead of the “all houses” table. The court also decided that the reduction in the basic wage which was to have come into operation to-day should not apply. The immediate effect will be to increase the Federal basic wage in Melbourne by 4/1 per week, in Sydney by 2/8, in Brisbane by 4/7, in Adelaide by 3/7, in Perth by 2/4, and in Hobart by 2/8.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ST19330508.2.76

Bibliographic details

Southland Times, Issue 22009, 8 May 1933, Page 7

Word Count
150

BASIC WAGE Southland Times, Issue 22009, 8 May 1933, Page 7

BASIC WAGE Southland Times, Issue 22009, 8 May 1933, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert