Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

GORSE v. BROOM.

To the Editor.

Sir,—Visitors along Moulson street and Brown street may be charmed with the flowers of gorse and broom, but not the ratepayers living near who clean their properties of the rubbish. In walking around the centre of the city I see over doors, inspector this and that; but why is it that nothing is done in the matter until someone calls attention to it through the Press? It is generally those people who can afford to get it done who don’t until forced. I say again it is not fair to those who clean their properties of gorse, etc. —I am, etc.

RATEPAYER.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ST19320926.2.38.1

Bibliographic details

Southland Times, Issue 21821, 26 September 1932, Page 5

Word Count
108

GORSE v. BROOM. Southland Times, Issue 21821, 26 September 1932, Page 5

GORSE v. BROOM. Southland Times, Issue 21821, 26 September 1932, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert