Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

GRAFT CHARGES

SYDNEY SCANDAL ROYAL COMMISSION RESUMES CROSS-EXAMINATION OF MALING (United Press Assn.—By Telegraph—Copyright.) Sydney, May 28. The Royal Commission inquiry into civic affairs resumed to-day. Mr Silas Y. Maling, under cross-examina-tion by counsel for certain aidermen, said that Inspector Mackay of the New South Wales Criminal Investigation Department showed him statements made by Buckle, Albert and Miss Gordon at the police office, Wellington, but did not tell witness that he had placed himself within reach of the law in connection with the Babcock-Wilcox contract. What Mackay said was that witness had committed a breach of the Stamp Duties Act. Witness denied that Mackay said anything about a warrant or that he could take witness back to Sydney in connection with the stamp duties matter. Witness admitted that he kept Mackay in ignorance of the fact that' he had received £2OOO out of the Babcock-Wilcox contract, and did not alter this statement until he returned to Sydney and consulted his solicitor. He also admitted telling Mackay that he paid £BOOO to Aiderman Green, and that Albert had got the remainder. He also asked Mackay if the latter believed Albert would handle the transaction without getting something out of it. In reply to a further question witness said that while at Rotorua he received a letter from Albert which advised witness to get out of the country, to leave on a foreign ship and not on any account to return to Sydney. The letter from Maling while in New Zealand to his solicitor was then read in which he stated: “As I surmised a police officer has been sent to see me about certain matters and I have now decided to return to my job as I still believe I will be compelled to return on a trumped-up charge.” The letter proceeds to state that he was informed that Albert was making highly damaging statements about him, and suggested that the solicitor should write *to Albert in order to compel him to desist.— Australian Press Association.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ST19280529.2.50

Bibliographic details

Southland Times, Issue 20498, 29 May 1928, Page 7

Word Count
335

GRAFT CHARGES Southland Times, Issue 20498, 29 May 1928, Page 7

GRAFT CHARGES Southland Times, Issue 20498, 29 May 1928, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert