Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FLAG CONTROVERSY

DISSENSION IN SOUTH AFRICA. FLYING THE UNION JACK. Capetown, May 22. The bitterness of lhe flag controversy has been revived by the limitations with regard to public institutions on which the Union Jack may be flown. The Parliamentarians are striving to reach an understanding, and the interviews with the Premier and the Minister of the Interior, which were continued last night and resumed to-day, have not concluded. Capetown is demanding that the Union Jack be flown on the Castle, on which it has been flown since the British occupation, and the Supreme Court, as well as the Parliamentary Buildings and Administrator’s Office. Natal is insisting on the unrestricted flying of the Union Jack on all public buildings.—United Service.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ST19280524.2.75

Bibliographic details

Southland Times, Issue 20494, 24 May 1928, Page 7

Word Count
120

FLAG CONTROVERSY Southland Times, Issue 20494, 24 May 1928, Page 7

FLAG CONTROVERSY Southland Times, Issue 20494, 24 May 1928, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert