Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE RABBIT ACT

SOUTHLAND TIMES CRITICISM. DENIAL BY THE MINISTER. (Special to the Times). WELLINGTON, November 6. “The Southland Times evidently refuses to accept as correct the very plain statements I have already made. In the circumstances I would be more than warranted in going no further,” said the Minister of Agriculture to-day. “In view, however, of the fact that the paper’s readers may be wrongly influenced by the suggestions conveyed in this last publication, I will once more state that a search of the Departmental records for the past two years shows that no application to prosecute under the Rabbit Act which came to me was refused. The Southland Times refuses to accept this, and asks for a positive declaration that every request to prosecute under the Rabbit Act was granted promptly. It is obvious that this is only putting the same point in another way. Every such request was granted, both as regards the North and South Islands, and the approval was given promptly. In no case was there a delay which could have operated as a refusal. So much for that WORK OF INSPECTORS. “Now I want to go further,” said Mr Nosworthy, “and to state definitely that the inspectors have not had their efficiency blunted by Departmental brakes.’ In making a statement that this is the case, the Times has either said too much or two little, and it should make its position clear. I note that the anonymous “Runholder” has again come to light with a letter criticising the Department, in which he expresses his refusal to give information regarding the case he referred to in his previous letter, because to do so would expose the inspectors ‘doing faithful but hopeless’ work ‘to the wrath of the Department.’ Why does not the correspondent come out in the open and state his ease manfully? He need not shelter behind the fear of getting the inspectors into trouble. The Public Service Commissioner is there to see that they are justly treated, and neither I nor any administrative officers have any intention of doing anything which is not fair and just. As a matter of fact the inspectors are a very hard working and trustworthy body of men, and they have done, and are doing excellent work to control the rabbit pest.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ST19241107.2.45

Bibliographic details

Southland Times, Issue 19394, 7 November 1924, Page 5

Word Count
384

THE RABBIT ACT Southland Times, Issue 19394, 7 November 1924, Page 5

THE RABBIT ACT Southland Times, Issue 19394, 7 November 1924, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert