Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE ALLIES’ REPLY

PRESIDENT WILSON’S SPEECH. HOW IT XS INTERPRETED. (By Telegraph—Press Assn.—Copyright) (Australian and N.Z. Cable Association.) LONDON, January 24. Received January 25, 5.25 p.m. Newspapers of both parties interpret President Wilson’s speech as being antagonistic to the Entente. REPLY BY ICR BONAR LAW. TO PRESIDENT WILSON'S SPEECH. WHAT WE ARE FIGHTING POB. (Australian & N.Z. Cable Assn & Reuter) LONDON, January 25. Received January 25, 9.50 p.m. Mr Bonar Law, at Bristol, replying to President Wilson’s speech, declared that the German so-called peace offer was received by the Allies with the only possible reply. He said: “W© believe that the essence of this conflict is a question which is as old as time, namely, the difference between right and wrong. We know this is a war of naked aggression, and that the crimes which accompanied the conduct of the war have been unknown in the world for centuries; but these are small compared with the initial crime of plunging the world into a war by cold-blooded calculation, because those responsible thought it would pay. Our aim coincides with President Wilson’s effort to secure a present and a future peace. It would not be right to regard President Wilson’s effort in regard to a League of Peace altogether utopian; but the subject is not an absolute question for the future, but a question of life and death now.” Proceeding, Mr Bonar Law dwelt on the past efforts to render war impossible or, leastwise, to mitigate the horrors of war. Germany had wholesaiely violated the conventions and pledges thereanent, and no neutral power was able to stop her, and no neutral, indeed, had protested. He added: “So we must take other means to secure a future peace for the world. We rejected the German negotiations and offer, because peace now would mean a peace based on a German victory, which would leave the military machine unbroken and with a halo of success surrounding it. The controllers of that machine would re-preparc for war, choosing a convenient time to begin. What President Wilson is longing for, we are fighting for, our man folk arc risking their lives for, and we mean to secure it.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ST19170126.2.23.7

Bibliographic details

Southland Times, Issue 17933, 26 January 1917, Page 5

Word Count
361

THE ALLIES’ REPLY Southland Times, Issue 17933, 26 January 1917, Page 5

THE ALLIES’ REPLY Southland Times, Issue 17933, 26 January 1917, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert