Magistrate’s Court.
THURSDAY, 2b(h APRIL. (Before Mr S. E. McCarthy, S.M.) UNDEFENDED. Judgments by default were given in Lem lie and Sons v. Mrs Aitkon (Orepukrj,' fur £s 18s Id, C jsts 10s; Henderson and Hatger v. J. Holmes and Go. (Wellington;. for £l4 J7« fid, costs ill Ills Gd ; McKenzie and Roche v. R. Herrv (Woodlands). for £ll 7s, costs £2 3s Gd. DISPUTED COMMISSION. C. W. Brown (Mr F. V. Raymond; v. J, Williams (Mr W. Maealistcr), was a claim tor £43 12s for services rendered if the request of dele ulaiit, whereby Certain lards belonging to defendant Were. Sold in a purchaser. Fv-deuce was given by (he plaiutid that the property.'situated' at East Road wv,s placed in his hands by tbe defendant fie sale. C. Froggatt told him of a likely purchaser and witness succeeded in disposing l of the property. —Other evidence was given in support of the claim. The defence was a denial that the defendant's farm had ever Iwen in the plnintiir.s hands for sale. It was admitted that defendant's son placed a farm of 70 acres in plaintiff's hands to sell. Hut no authority to deal with defendant’s farm of 178 acres was given. After hearing argument, his Worship reserved his decision.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ST19060427.2.33
Bibliographic details
Southland Times, Issue 19806, 27 April 1906, Page 2
Word Count
209Magistrate’s Court. Southland Times, Issue 19806, 27 April 1906, Page 2
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Southland Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.