Conciliation and Arbitration
Pet United Press ABaoßtfttion.
CiJKISTOnUHCH. Kov? 0. I A peculiar position was disclosed at tho coauiienceuieut of. the tanners' dispute , before .tho ConcillAtioitS^wi this inorning. The Employer*' TJntoa, **. \ plaiuing in a letter why they were not * h2STdS2iS cl A fl ftte<l that tM -«i» W» ♦ had decided for various reasons to take th « c« s <J dirpct to the Arbitration Court, * and tho Union made application to thii • \ fT& l X^ 8 fou ? d * ftowwwr. • thit this ■•'■:■ could not be received as in order kZ causa under 6 oiu« technicality of the liiw not only the , Employers' Union, but also every individual, employed outside the on the o(her side only the vslimature J?t an'ofllcinl of tho Workers' Uuion wou?d lie necessary to attain tho desired em, AJI signatures of employers cited coViYh not be obtained because many wew» tCoi dont in other districts. The Union r«T f rette,l. therefore, that th, only [eft to then, was to allow th* case ™& by default as regards the Board Ahrf b!trution att Wfcr U U thC C ° u?t £■
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ST19031104.2.25
Bibliographic details
Southland Times, Issue 19194, 4 November 1903, Page 2
Word Count
178Conciliation and Arbitration Southland Times, Issue 19194, 4 November 1903, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.