The Sugar Duties.
(Per United Press Association.) By Electric Telegraph—Copyright,
London, Deo. 12.
In the Commons, Mr Balfour admitted that the Crown law officers, in 1880, considered counter-vailing duties on bounty fed sugar contrary to the most-favoured nation clause of existing treaties. He would not admit the relevance between the'discussion of tne question as it exists and the opinion expressed in 1880.
(Russia contests the right of Britain to impose counter-vailing duties on bounty fed sugar. Some firmly worded messages have passed between the two countries, and a leading newspaper in St. Petersburg has twice gone the length of threatening, but Britain has remained firm and refuses to recede from the position she has taken up.)
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ST19021215.2.27
Bibliographic details
Southland Times, Issue 18019, 15 December 1902, Page 2
Word Count
116The Sugar Duties. Southland Times, Issue 18019, 15 December 1902, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.