Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A Drop too Much.

An Auckland merchant writes to his paper :—We have a wonderful law, of which I am a victim, which enacts that case spirits imported into the colony shall be each an equal number of gallons, either 2,3, 4, or 5, as the case may be. The merchant when importing orders his parcels to be an equal number of gallons, but has to put up with the risk of the gauge here being measured the same as from the exporting country. If a parcel measures two gallons and one gill, the merchant is called upon to pay duty on three gallons, in other words, 16s for what does not exist in the case. Even though an offer be made to pay down the duty on the gill in excess on the number of oases, this is refused by the Customs, and the wording of the Act carried out—" Two gallons and under as two gallons, two gallons and not exceeding three gallons as three gallons, and so on.” We will instance a merchant importing a 1000 cases Geneva. These are ordered to be each four gallons, and of certain strength. On landing them here a few cases are measured by the customs offices, and he declares upou this the whole shipment to be four gallons and one gill each case. The merchant is called upon in this way to pay duty on 1000 cases of five gallons each, whereas they only measure four gallons and one gill. The* Customs refuse to take the excess duty on 1000 galls, but claim duty on each case of 31 galls in excess of actual measurement, which, on 1000 cases, would amount to tbo round sum of £775, or a little more than prime cost of the shipment. The only alternative that is left, is for the merchant to export the geneva elsewhere, to some country where red tapeism is not as rampant as in New Zealand, and where a merchant is not made a victim to a Gill Too Much.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SCANT18920206.2.21

Bibliographic details

South Canterbury Times, Issue 6753, 6 February 1892, Page 2

Word Count
340

A Drop too Much. South Canterbury Times, Issue 6753, 6 February 1892, Page 2

A Drop too Much. South Canterbury Times, Issue 6753, 6 February 1892, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert