Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT.

TIMARU SESSIONS. Per Press Association Timaru, May 85 At the Supreme Court the Grand Jury returned true hills in all three cases submitted to them. Two men, who had pleaded guilty, were dealt with. Ales Charles Mackenzie, who had defrauded his employer, a master baker of £7O, received for bread delivered, and, whilst under remand for sentence in that case had stolen a man’s Post Office bank book and forged a withdrawal order for £4O, was sentenced to reformative treatment up to five years, Albert C T Lamb, who broke from prison at Timaru while awaiting trial on a charge of theft of which when tried he was found not guilty, was now brought up on his plea of guilty to prison breaking. His counsel pointed out that as he had been acquitted of the charge on which he was detained in prison, the charge'of breaking did not lie. His Honour agreed, and ordered the discontinuance of the proceedings. Edward Ellis, a steward on the s,s. Oorinthio, charged with stealing an overcoat from the shop of J Craigio when the steamer was in Timaru, was acquitted, the only evidence against him being that a coat was found in his bunk at Wellington, and he denied all knowledge of it. Two other members of the same crew, L Valentino and V L Ellis, were charged with thefts of an overcoat and a doormat. The latter was found at the Customhouse, which was broken into the same night. The jury disagreed, and a new trial will be held.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RAMA19200527.2.25

Bibliographic details

Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XLV, Issue 12063, 27 May 1920, Page 5

Word Count
258

SUPREME COURT. Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XLV, Issue 12063, 27 May 1920, Page 5

SUPREME COURT. Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XLV, Issue 12063, 27 May 1920, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert