Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT.

Per Press Association. Wellington, Jane 5. This morning in the Supreme Court it was "announced that the divorce case. Albert E. O. W. Brooks v. Cecilia Myrtle Brooks and Donald McKenzie, in which the petitioner claimed £4OOO damages, had been settled, co-respondent consenting to the verdict of the jury for £1250 damages with costs. The Chief Justice explained to the jury that the money would not go to the petitioner, ‘but be set aside for the benefit of the children, and, possibly, the wife. Repljdng to counsel, the Judge said respondent, as well as petitioner, was entitled to costs. The jury returned a formal verdict for £1205 and costs.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RAMA19190605.2.68

Bibliographic details

Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XLV, Issue 11850, 5 June 1919, Page 8

Word Count
111

SUPREME COURT. Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XLV, Issue 11850, 5 June 1919, Page 8

SUPREME COURT. Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XLV, Issue 11850, 5 June 1919, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert