Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ASSESSMENT COURT.

FRIDAY’S SITTING. j The Court resumed at Marion at i 10 o’clock on Friday morning. • Mrs Goodrum’s objection against } the valuations imposed on sections I bordering on Cubbabbala, Stewart and Blackwell streets was heard. The Court sustained the valuations ; >'n seven sections at £SO, four were ffiuced from £SO to £45, one from i £SO to £4O, two from £SO to £25, .and one from £6O to £SO Mrs Dommett’s objection against the valuation of two sections in Wellington Road was upheld, and the valuation reduced from £IOO to £BO each. A. Hawlm’s sections in Wellington Road were reduced from £IS)S to £165, and from £133 to £lls. Mrs Lyon’s property in High Street was reduced from £528 to £350, and sections in Grey Street from £6O to £45, £6O to £35, and £IOO to £SO. Improvements on the property in Pukepapa Line were reduced from £4lO to £350. Davenport Bros.’ objection to the valuation of their business property in Broadway and High Str - c was not sustained, and the valuator’s assessment of 78 feet at £35 per foot in Broadway and 54 feat at £lO per foot in High Street stands. The Borough’s objection to this valuation, which they considered too low, was thrown out on a technical point. As there are twenty-six other objections to consider, the Bench decided to adjourn the Court till 10 o’clock on ’Friday, 13th June. Th 9 Borough withdrew a number of eases in which is was considered that the valuation was too low. Most of tbs properties objected to were on the basiuofes side of Broadway.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RAMA19130531.2.50

Bibliographic details

Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXVII, Issue 10660, 31 May 1913, Page 5

Word Count
266

ASSESSMENT COURT. Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXVII, Issue 10660, 31 May 1913, Page 5

ASSESSMENT COURT. Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXVII, Issue 10660, 31 May 1913, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert