Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CANADA AND AMERICA.

United Press Association—By Electric Telegraph—Copyright. Louden, May 7. In the House of Commons, Mr Page Croft asked whether the Government would consider Imperial Preference In order to defeat Presi dent Taft’s design to make Canada an adjunct of America. Mr Asquith, Prime Minister, replied that the Taft -Roosevelt letters were private. The Hon. Sir James Bryce, British Ambassador at Washington, had no knowledge of the contents There was nothing inthe correspondence to make the Government latter its polloygregardiug preference. Hon Sir James Bryce only saw Mr Peildlag in order to learn the facts He only gave assistance when asked. The Canadian people would resent interference. Hon Sir James Bryce’s action had inspired confidence in Canada. He would support the policy of the present Government equally with that of its predecessors. Mr Page Croft moved the adjournment of the House. He accused the Government of supporting AmericanCanadian reciprocity, wherein it had been ill-informed. Hon. Sir James Brvoe had not kept the Government in "touch with these negotiations. It that after the Canadian verdict he should have .been promoted to another sphere gof usefulness. _

Sir Edward Qrey, Foreign Minister, repudiated unfair attacks on the Hon. Sir Janies Bryce who did nothing whatever to induce Uanada to accept President JTaft’s proposals. He was not present during the negotiations. Sir Edward asked did tbe critics think Sir James Bryce ought ;to have stopped the negotiations? If Sir James Bryce had shown a reluctance to support the Canadian Government. it would have been difficult to resist a demand 'for separate diplomatic representation.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/RAMA19120508.2.44

Bibliographic details

Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXVI, Issue 10344, 8 May 1912, Page 5

Word Count
260

CANADA AND AMERICA. Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXVI, Issue 10344, 8 May 1912, Page 5

CANADA AND AMERICA. Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXVI, Issue 10344, 8 May 1912, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert