Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

EELS PREY ON TROUT

“A SLOW-GROWING BEAST’' 121 N. LONG IN EIGHT YEARS One of the most serious threats to the existence of young trout fry is the eel. Several items of interest concerning its life were given last evening to the meeting of the East Coast Acclimatisation Society by Mr. D. F. Hobbs, the Government biologist to the Freshwater Research Fisheries Department. Mr. Hobbs advised that the depredations made by eels should be investigated thoroughly. In the stomachs of small eels would be found small fry or trout and the larger the eels were the larger the trout eaten by them. Eels and trout fed on much the same food. Apart from competing for food, the eels were also preying on the trout. Eels were only available to trout as food on rare occasions and an eel was seldom found in the stomach of a trout. The larger and more financial societies were assisting the research in their investigations and a large-scale experiment was being carried out in Southland. Endeavours to eliminate the eels from the rivers there were being carried out by the use of hinakis.

Mr. Hobbs said that eels were slowgrowing beasts, being about two years’ old when they came into the rivers from the sea. At the age of eight years they were only 12in. long so an indication of the age of some of the very big eels could be arrived at. On account of that fact and the understanding that they usually frequented the same old feeding grounds it was thought that if the eels were completely cleared from a river it would retard their progress to such an extent that it might be another 15 years before they were established again in that river. In reply to a question, Mr. Hobbs said that as long as it was not a cataract, eels could go up falls in a river, the same as trout. He had seen them climb up a vertical wet wall that was covered with moss. Eels exuded a slimy substance only when afraid.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBH19380317.2.30

Bibliographic details

Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LXV, Issue 19585, 17 March 1938, Page 4

Word Count
344

EELS PREY ON TROUT Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LXV, Issue 19585, 17 March 1938, Page 4

EELS PREY ON TROUT Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LXV, Issue 19585, 17 March 1938, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert