NO EVIDENCE FOR JURY
CHARGE OP RECEIVING CPer/Fross Association.) WELLINGTON, this day. In the ease of the King v. Lucinsky, heard by the Appeal Court last week, the Appeal Court held that there was no evidence on either of the, counts to go to the .jury, and that the trial judge was correct in directing the jury to return a verdict of not guilty on Loth counts. The question of whether or not an fpused person could. ,J)C found guilty p, receiving; coin or hank'notes when 16 .particular coin or bank notes had been changed before being received hv the accused was, in tlie opinion of the court, dependent upon the facts in each particular case.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBH19350713.2.125
Bibliographic details
Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LXII, Issue 18757, 13 July 1935, Page 15
Word Count
116NO EVIDENCE FOR JURY Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LXII, Issue 18757, 13 July 1935, Page 15
Using This Item
The Gisborne Herald Company is the copyright owner for the Poverty Bay Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Gisborne Herald Company. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in