Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LAWSUIT LOST

“BOOP-A-DOOP” CTRL NEW YORK, May 7. Helen Kane, tho “Boop-a-Doop” singer, lost her big claim for damages against the Paramount Cinema Company, for alleged infringement of copyright, ' „ Alter a spectacular three weeks’ trial, Judge McGoldrick found that her singing technique ; was common to a number of “Boop-a-Doopers,” even before she claimed to have invented the idea and mannerisms. Helen Kane, who claimed to be the pioneer of “Boop-a-Doop,” sued Max Fleischer, the cartoonist, and the Paramount Cinertia 'Company for 250,000 dollars (£50,000) for the alleged appropriating of the “Boop-a-Doop” idea. Fleischer insisted that the Betty Boop of the films was a creature of his own imagination, although ante-dated by “Boop-a-Doop.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBH19340516.2.4

Bibliographic details

Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LXI, Issue 18398, 16 May 1934, Page 2

Word Count
112

LAWSUIT LOST Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LXI, Issue 18398, 16 May 1934, Page 2

LAWSUIT LOST Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LXI, Issue 18398, 16 May 1934, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert