Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

£SOOO DAMAGES CLAIM

FARMERS AT LAW SHEEP STATION DEAL (Per Press Association.) INVERCARGILL, this day. Alleging misrepresentation on a number of vital points in regard to the purchase in 1929 of a property of 9497 aerfes at Mossburn, known as Manapouri station, John MacDonald, of Manapouri, a sheepfarmer, and Archibald Allan MacDonald, of Waipori, a sheepfarmer (Mr J. M. Paterson, Dunedin) in the Supreme Court yesterday, before Mr Justice Kennedy, claimed from John MacDonald, of Invercargill, company manager, and Angus MacDonald, of the Plains station, Mossburn (Mr 11. J. Macalister), the sum of £SOOO damages,- being the amount which they contended they had paid in excess of the real value. The plaintiffs contended that as a result of their reliance upon the alleged

representations, which they had believed to be true, they had paid £SOOO too much for the property. The plaintiff’s took possession on September 1, 1929, and still remain in possession of the property. ■The statement of defence was a de- , nial of the allegations of misrepresentation. The defendants admitted that < they agreed to reduce the purchase price by £2500, and that no interest should be paid until February, 191J3, but denied that they agreed to consider a further reduction in respect of the balance of £2500 at any time. They agreed, however, to consider the question of a further concession in interest in February, 1933, if the prices for primary products had not then improved. As a further defence, the defendants set out that they were, and had always been, willing to implement the agreement by the execution of the documents necessary to give effect thereto, and, finally, that if, which they denied, the plaintiffs had good cause for action against the defendants, this had been satisfied by the arrangement entered into, which had IbeeAcceptcd by the plaintiffs in satisfaction of the alleged cause of action. After hearing lengthy evidence, the court adjourned till to-day.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBH19340516.2.37

Bibliographic details

Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LXI, Issue 18398, 16 May 1934, Page 5

Word Count
318

£5000 DAMAGES CLAIM Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LXI, Issue 18398, 16 May 1934, Page 5

£5000 DAMAGES CLAIM Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LXI, Issue 18398, 16 May 1934, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert