PLAINTIFF SUCCEEDS
CITRUS FARM DEAL FRAUD ALLEGATION (Per Press Association.) AUCKLAND, this day. Judgment on the facts was given by Mr. Justice Ostler to-day at the conclusion of the hearing of a claim by John A. M. 6. Uoodford against the NewZealand Citrus Plantations, Limited, William Henry Ball, a director, and David Rufus Williams, the company’s London; agent. “The plaintiff is legally justified m repudiating his contract, and to judgment for the moneys paid to the company, and to all expenses down to the) time of the discovery of the.fraud,” said the judge. He gave judgment for £§4o, plus £196 expenses, the fares from England. Argument is proceeding concerning the plaintiff’s claim for £2ofc general damages. ■
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBH19340301.2.149
Bibliographic details
Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LXI, Issue 18335, 1 March 1934, Page 13
Word Count
116PLAINTIFF SUCCEEDS Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LXI, Issue 18335, 1 March 1934, Page 13
Using This Item
The Gisborne Herald Company is the copyright owner for the Poverty Bay Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Gisborne Herald Company. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in