Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NOT A “STRIKE”

FREEZING WORKERS’ CASE (Per Press Association.) AUCKLAND, litis day. Mr. IV. E. Kill, .secretary of the Auckland branch of the Freezing Works Employees' Union, in a statement of |lie case for the men, stresses tlio point that all freezing works employees are not slaughtermen. Slaughtermen only were concerned in the local dispute, which, he says, is not a strike and was due to the refusal of the employers 1o discuss the conditions of the industry. They did not; present any demands, hut merely asked for a friendly conference and all they got was a snub. Last season the men employed at Southdown earned on the average 67s a week each. For about half of the short freezing season they were idle.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBH19261127.2.56

Bibliographic details

Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LII, Issue 16202, 27 November 1926, Page 6

Word Count
124

NOT A “STRIKE” Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LII, Issue 16202, 27 November 1926, Page 6

NOT A “STRIKE” Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LII, Issue 16202, 27 November 1926, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert