Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CLAIM AGAINST CROWN.

COST OF REMOVING RUBBISH

(Per Press Association.) AUCKLAND, last night

In the Supreme Court Mr Justice Stringer gave judgment for the City Council in a case against the Crown, claiming the sum of £2l 8s 7d as a charge for collecting and removing refuse from post offices in the city. The case was heard last Thursday. His Honor said the contention that the Crown was not bound by the provisions of the Municipal Corporations Act was correct. The case must be decided apart from the provisions of the Act. The Crown, having availed itself of the facilities offered, was under obligation to pay for them at a reasonable sum.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBH19240506.2.35

Bibliographic details

Poverty Bay Herald, Volume L, Issue 16423, 6 May 1924, Page 5

Word Count
112

CLAIM AGAINST CROWN. Poverty Bay Herald, Volume L, Issue 16423, 6 May 1924, Page 5

CLAIM AGAINST CROWN. Poverty Bay Herald, Volume L, Issue 16423, 6 May 1924, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert