Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BEEF AND MUTTON.

MEAT BOARD’S ADVICE TO CON

SUMERS

There are at present, killed for consumption in Now Zealand, in round figures, 2.250,000 sheep. Of these, at least. 1.00.000 could be. exported if more beef were eaten, and they would bring in a return of 25s per head net profit to New Zealand. This would menu, in round figures, £1,250.000 per annum. These figures were recently submitted by an expert, in the meal, export trade in giving his opinion as to the desirability of the people of New Zealand .substituting to a greater extent, the consumption of beef for mutton. The same authority, who is a member of the Meat-

Board, pointed out. that it. was undoubtedly necessary that, cattle should he bred and run on farms, apart, altogether from the dairying industry, for there were very few parts of New Zealand which could he farmed with sheep only, ami which require to have stock run over the land to furnish the necessary change in order to produce the grass. Therefore, he pointed out, it was absolutely compulsory for farmers to continue breeding cattle, but at the same time if there were no outlet for this class of meat, it could he seen how seriously affected was the fanning industry of Hie Dominion. Another point was that it. was extremely had policy to have alt our eggs in the one basket. Though at present lamb and mutton and dairy produce were our best paying products abroad, one never knew when beef might again come into profit, and it would he extremely bad should that happen, if Iho Dominion had virtually

killed its beef-raising industry. In addition to all this no one would deny the nutritious value of beef ns a food and it, was imposing no self-denial upon a community fo suggest that, beef should he substituted in households, even to the extent of one or two pounds a week, for other foods. '

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBH19230508.2.80

Bibliographic details

Poverty Bay Herald, Volume XLIX, Issue 16120, 8 May 1923, Page 8

Word Count
323

BEEF AND MUTTON. Poverty Bay Herald, Volume XLIX, Issue 16120, 8 May 1923, Page 8

BEEF AND MUTTON. Poverty Bay Herald, Volume XLIX, Issue 16120, 8 May 1923, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert