Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE MANGATU CASE.

DECISION OF SUPREME COURT. COMPENSATION FOR IMPROVEMENTS. Advice has been received that judgment. was delivered in (lie Supreme Court at Wellington this morning on an interim summons in the Mancatn ease, heard before Mr Justice Chapman. The Court decided entirely in favor of the, lessees, namely that they are entitled to a clause in their new lease authorising payment for all improvements as from the date of the original term to the end 1 of renewal of term, up to. £2 15s per acre. Mr Bunny, who appeared for defendant, the East Coast Commissioner, suggested that, he, might possibly appeal. Mr Myers, K.C., instructed by Messrs Ohrisp and Clirisp, appeared for (he successful tenants.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBH19221017.2.8

Bibliographic details

Poverty Bay Herald, Volume XLVIII, Issue 15955, 17 October 1922, Page 3

Word Count
117

THE MANGATU CASE. Poverty Bay Herald, Volume XLVIII, Issue 15955, 17 October 1922, Page 3

THE MANGATU CASE. Poverty Bay Herald, Volume XLVIII, Issue 15955, 17 October 1922, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert