COURT CASE.
(To llie Editor of the Herald.) Sir,—ln reference to the evidence tendered at the court on the 9lh inst/, and published in your payer of even date, in riispeet. to the claim for possession of a house. viz. Walker v. Sluice, the evidence given by Mrs. Walker that I assured her of possession of the house within a. week or a month is misleading. The. contract I made for my client with the purchaser, Mrs. Walker, was •(hat the purchaser was to arrange for possession with the tenant. ’ I could not guarantee possession and » I distinctly told both (he purchaser and her husband so, in the presence of a third party; also a copy of tlie contract, it produced in court, would bear out my statement.- —I am, etc., • MARRY LLALL.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBH19210611.2.52.1
Bibliographic details
Poverty Bay Herald, Volume XLVII, Issue 15543, 11 June 1921, Page 5
Word Count
133COURT CASE. Poverty Bay Herald, Volume XLVII, Issue 15543, 11 June 1921, Page 5
Using This Item
The Gisborne Herald Company is the copyright owner for the Poverty Bay Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Gisborne Herald Company. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in