Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A DISPUTED DEAL.

The: case of O. ti. JW.. Scott jind \Vil-, liam Branson v. "W. M. Sherratt, R^h-' ard Sherratt, aiid David. 'Barry y las trustees of the Poverty' Bjiy Hunt'Clup), claim £200. was-'concluded ot the Aliigv istrate's Cfc*urt y'esterdl.ay afternOohijudgment being- reserved.-. .Additional evidencje for tho defence' was/as* follbwiß*: . Ashtbn S. Wachsmann deposed thathis,firm was agent foi* wt. H.\ D** Buchanan,; whb^putup.'ijhe'stsabiers^ifded room, and exercise ytuJd m- . Ootobfer, j 1*913, the, cost being £50^; 3s- Id; . Wlien : Jie saw it last he' wonl'd; -have written' it down at £16 to £20 V^iy knew; tihe cost of materials ihad'einceT increased. The building to-dajj- woifldT;cosfe;^Bso.; Percy Walsh, stated thSt* prior s j to October, 1913, he was huntsman, TaSid lived m the. cottage. • Last, year it **?a_' m poor condition, lealchig badly, -. and' often he had hiad do ge. up at night and' moye the bed. T Tlie -timher was prai-fr cally rotten. The lean-to was about the. size .of the yitness-bb}.. He said *'he. could hot live^n , it another winter. Tflie: s"nia,ller t'oom, Bft ;by Bft';. was erectefy four,or;five years ag^- Yi He. it would hp/ye b.e_*A' -^saible^ to* hd% v d' S'e-, paired it. ' '. '' V V '/' '"■'''. 1' \" Edward ci*riE^hj6iV icVeman to Mr Haisman,j b^derV : T^ap6"led; that .he was engagenT^de^b^n)^^'.' ihe cottage. It was jix^ ( yeryba9 Yobnditiph. The timber was -.^hi-td' pine ;*illl though. The borei v was, all through •^eTold/'ph.rt and star-ing hi tlje^n^w. . fljie 'o&ttige. was hot fit for habitation. TH^was^n*prised to -see a* „P%i§ ■ Mke '-tnis. "y?nieu they took the iron oft tli^ .r^f the s philcl-; ing collapsed. He would* h6tYpl*ae6*"mbre than £20 on it-. .Thei. stable W9S unpainted and .suh-cfacked | ''lie -valued' ' it at £10. He .valued...t he iron on the kennels at '£S,\ anct tlib copper ..^ £2Y The, iron was not fit; to be 1 used, on the new building, and xwm used Tfor;.putt]ing

round tho bottom of the kennels. Ho valued the total iron at £15.

William O. Skeet, builder and architect, stated that he examined the building m October, 1916, and found it m a very dilapidated state, right on the ground. Tlie building was of white pine, with.-. /the borer through- it.- He recommended that none of' the" material be used. Its full value was £20. Tlie stable was; m aba < bad -.state and he valued it. at £11 l'Os 'to '.£_&,■. antl kennels £9 to £10. The iroii. on the -. th**ee • buildings was, worth £i3.-r^To _dr . Wauchop : He could have erected a, stable an, less than the original price.* TIW co.tagfecould not be. repaired!.. , '■■'■. 4fte'r counsel addressed tlie court his Worship reserved judgment.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBH19171031.2.58

Bibliographic details

Poverty Bay Herald, Volume XLIV, Issue 14442, 31 October 1917, Page 8

Word Count
433

A DISPUTED DEAL. Poverty Bay Herald, Volume XLIV, Issue 14442, 31 October 1917, Page 8

A DISPUTED DEAL. Poverty Bay Herald, Volume XLIV, Issue 14442, 31 October 1917, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert