Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

EXEMPTION QUESTIONS.

CLERGY AND TEACHERS

COUNOIL REJECTS W^OiLFJ CLAUSE; : ' ■ • (Prona -Our ,P«\ififtaentaty Reporter.) ' WELLINGTON, this day. The Legislative .Council, m considering the Expeditionary Force Amendment Bill last ' nig-ht; devoted attention solely to the exemption clause, which it struck out, .thus eliminating wholly the exemption either of clergy or teachers. A conference will follow between both Houses, and" as .the, : division was taken when" there -was only a small attendance of the Council, probably some compromise will be evolved. " '

Sir- Rrancis Bell, m moving the second reading of the, Bill, said ,i that speaking with a knowledge ■of years of experience as Minister of Education, he ■believed the education 1 's'ei'Vice- had leached a point at which; further deple-* tion of the primary ' and secondary schools' staffs should "he prevented.- .The •contention would be raised --that' the exemption covered' -a. class' of "persons for wTiom it would have been > difficult to obtain direct exemption. In the presence of such differences as' existed ■ ore the subject, it was manifest 1 that rtri attempt to single out a section 'of teachers would have met with', strong oppositions Were members prepared to say; that all teachers m ' primary "and sec6ndary; schools were to be .'placed'. in'- -a 'position equal to that of the 1 ! last 'irian on the/ farm? Teachers were necessary ''unless education were to cease ■' 'during 1 He'" war;' Male teachers were essential ■cr : *.h children of certain ages; and: if this wore admitted then there was no reason why the Marist Brothers should not stand m the same 'position as State rschool teachers. He sincerely hoped the Council -could disclisa the" matter without that ; hateful religious bitteimess which was a. most distressing ■'■ f'enture of political life. S nreVy it fonld Hot be said our schbbls : were on the same level as ordinary schools? ■'•■".' ' '-..-' Mr ' Earnshaw ;' suggested that ' the leader of the ' Council -could be as adroit as- he could be straightforward -• -when it suited liitn^ It. t^as- his : duty to put throtign t"K6 measure -'as' it . psS&b<3 ° ? - the Lower House, and he" had" njade an able speech : with' 1 which, he .(Mr.;fiavnshaw) absolutely' 'disagreed: '■• ITfld : the BilL come from r -the Lowe? ! Hbusc out the;- teachers* exemption clause,- he would have done his best to put it through.^: ; (Hear. r-hear.);jjr"^-.'.'',i.v Sir Francis Bell : ThatV no reason, for disregarding . my. .argument,.. . A PARTY ~DWp*&s/ jMt -Earnshaw, continuing,. said that ip order to exeinpjt. .^ . mciv r f rom serving, ii pt '■ m the trenches,' but !. in -.som c, noncombatant. v^r^Vii'^C^dnde'dided to exempt an enpi'mous" number o f pother persons.. ,This,. shpWe.d. we epprinous. influence of .a ; .cert ai^ . .^ectidn. . ; ; VV here was the .do.ctvine'roj ; t^e.;l%tii. mart and the last; :»hiUinfit. TbJoughlj.thet Jea'det of the Cbuncil lippef' sectarianism,^puld, not be introducedj 'yet .what,, was ;s.ee'n jn the Lower .House'? ;The.V ,jS|yision on the qu.estiori, wa^ ;abspju,telyVo"n party lines,; Minister and ■- , jheinjj^.rs ■•. ;b.eing divided , Liberals aiid^. Labor «gairist . '. Re» for^n, : excepfc for a few x^feach sidel H* intended iii cipmmitte© ,'^tp' move , the striking gut pi* tW clause. ;".- -,-_■..■ ; Mr slcGregbr 'suggested that'thel .exemption , of, teaolier.BJWasi.BQlely proposed m the interests of tlie Marist Brothers. The new claus^ raised- 4 j distinctly dts» I honest issue^ for the inclusion of primary and ,seoon,dary,iqschoo|. .-teachers was simply 'to cover ' up tne^real purpose. Though he would vote, against the clause he would not mind supporting a straightfonvard' proposal i^to... exclude ... ..^llarist 'Brother^. -„, , ■■■ "\ : - ■.'.'<.. ...vV'vV *-':'''"■ :; " : :Mr J\ G* ■W. Aitken jvemar^Bd,: that the Wellington ' board ; was. gstit»g:. : very short of male teachers. Tiey CouJ4-? fc *^ draw on a few superannuatedir-rjiien;. as/ well as ( a ,number. -cjf : womep. wife, were teachers befoiie they?Trefe .married. . vThe most urgent need. w&s\ to release men for military serviceii th.e.^hopeKjjf; bringing the war to a speedy 6nd,, " .. Air G. Garsonrobjected,.)tQ/.the exclusion, of ariy J class., .^ai" a ,cla.s^-",He felt indignant that; , the" esemplK>n ; of teachers' cl&use was, ii!ot, m. '■$£ T&ll .as the Government framed it. •: i : i '..'

. Sir Francis Bell, m reply, it was an Open secret since . thie • division, that Ministers were, not agreed upon this -prch vision for the exemption . of . teachers, but he .to assure, the Council that from the first he. ?and'the Minister of Education had unsweryingly adhered, to the principle % of exempting teachers. If Mr . would exempt Marist Brothecs it. was .beoause they were essential. Surely therlsame things applied to State -school teachers. „' - -. ..

The.'BilL. was read a second tune, on the, voices* .... ;. : „.

In committee, i> wljen .thel • clause, was I'ieachedj Ji'rancis Bell moved, -to add to the.. teachers!. < ; clause provision r that, it applies . to . those .who are teachers' at the time of the! passing of the .Act, -and .continue to be teachers. • ... .... ; ' „ .,,.'.- ' ;..'.' ' ? -.. ..;■ • Mr Barr asked -why ; the. Goyefnment was. not consistent in - ; applying the clause to, all teachers, whether. in camp' or .sphool. . , ... ■,»,;..,].,, .:■■■' ■ Tlie amendment > was, accepted; . ,- Mr.. J. 'G. ., W.~. . Aiken /moved -to,> delete the teachers' exemption clause; .but,subsequently iwaived m? order tp divide the Council on the retention of the., whole clause. ■- : ..-..'.. ..^ Sir William Hall-Joiles pointed out tliat' siaughterm'en' and ma^iy other; works were exempted, and why should members.regard teachers, ofvless.; importance. On a division -the whole ' clause providjng for the exemption of clergy and teachers was rejected by 11 votes to 4, the division being ir-r- ; Ayes: Bell, Paul, 'iMaghitunty, HallJ0ne5...... ' .' ■ -'..^ ...:■ ",,' .-[■,: ,;.,, '.','. .> ' ' Noes : Aitken, ,^arr,y^udhaloan, Carson, Morgan, 'Cfojfrnp, .Earjishiiw, •^Joore, MacGregpr,,, Sipapson, ;i!VfaqGipbpn. -. ; Tine leader.xif jth^^uncil.mjoved ,tp report progress, -Agreed to.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBH19171027.2.67

Bibliographic details

Poverty Bay Herald, Volume XLIV, Issue 14439, 27 October 1917, Page 8

Word Count
893

EXEMPTION QUESTIONS. Poverty Bay Herald, Volume XLIV, Issue 14439, 27 October 1917, Page 8

EXEMPTION QUESTIONS. Poverty Bay Herald, Volume XLIV, Issue 14439, 27 October 1917, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert